The NIAITS (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) is a US-government agency responsible for developing and testing new and innovative technologies.
For example, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has been working on an influenza vaccine for more than a decade, while the National Science Foundation (NSF) has spent $1.6 billion on R&Ds in the past.
The NIAIT was founded in 1921 by then-President Theodore Roosevelt to promote research and development for the US military, and it currently oversees more than 60 scientific and technical institutes across the country.
But the agency has recently been accused of bias and abuse of grant funding, with some researchers and researchers’ families claiming they were forced out of their research grants.
The US government recently released a document detailing how NIAETS is used to subsidise some research.
Among the alleged misconduct are research grants that were awarded to researchers who had not obtained NIH approval before receiving the funding, and those researchers who worked with NIH researchers.
The document alleges that NIAATS used these grants to pay researchers to collaborate with NIH scientists.
“The NIH grants are not the agency’s money,” said Dr Sarah Bickerton, director of the NIAOTS Science, Technology, and Innovation program.
“The money is used for grants to NIAIS for its own use, for other purposes and for the NBIs research and education efforts.”
The NIH also said that research funding is funded in line with federal guidelines.”NIH grants to universities are intended to provide funding for research and innovation, including the development of novel and transformative technologies that could have a positive impact on society,” said NIH spokeswoman Natalie Smith.
“We do not have a policy against research involving NIAIUS or its employees.”
Dr Bickert said that while NIAATs grant program has been criticised for its treatment of researchers, there are good reasons why it is important to fund research.”NIAATS has been a good partner in this program,” she said.
“It’s been extremely valuable for us to have the NPIES support.”
The document, released by the government on Tuesday, includes details of research funding awards for academic institutions in the US and overseas.
According to the document, NIAATTs grants for the past 10 years have been used to cover the cost of travel for the travel of NIA researchers to NIH facilities and for other related expenses, such as conference fees and travel costs.
“In many cases, NIH grants to academic institutions were approved with minimal research,” the document reads.
“NIH researchers are encouraged to contact NIH to discuss opportunities for research, but in some cases, NIB grants may be used to pay travel for NIA research.”
The Niaatts grant is a large amount of money, but not all research funding has been as contentious.
For instance, some of the documents shows that NIPC grants have been given to universities that received NIA’s grants, while some researchers who received NIPCs were also funded by the Niaatts grants.
“It’s an ongoing issue for us as a researcher,” Dr Bickster said.
The documents also say that research grants awarded to academic researchers are “subject to the same stringent criteria as those for academic research”.
“The NBI is committed to conducting rigorous oversight of all grant applications, and we review every application to ensure they meet our stringent requirements,” Dr Smith said.
However, Dr Bicksert said it was important to remember that NIH grants have not been directly linked to NIPCIAs research programmes, and that NIB funds are used for other scientific purposes.
“What we’re trying to do is ensure that this money is spent as it is,” she told Hack.
“This money has been given and it has been spent on the most promising projects.”
Follow @harrykimmel on Twitter.